Skip to content
  • About Us
  • Services

    Data

    Our approach is rooted in a combination of academic rigor, local expertise and innovative survey designs, ensuring that we always provide the highest quality data.

    Find Out More

    Research & Analytics

    At EDI Global, we are committed to providing high-quality research that tackles the most pressing development challenges of our time.

    Find Out More

    Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning

    EDI Global’s MEL Practice brings together high quality data, research insights, and cutting-edge MEL thinking and methodologies to help our clients assess programme performance and maximise impact. 

    Find Out More
  • Our Team

    Meet Our Team

    Meet the dedicated professionals who bring EDI Global’s mission to life, from design to final implementation.

    Find Out More

    Join Our Team

    Join EDI Global and embark on a career where meaningful impact and personal growth go hand in hand.

    Find Out More
  • Projects
  • Publications
Contact Us

Agriculture

Impact assessment of the use of Purdue Improved Crop Storage (PICS) bags by Pee Pee Tanzania Limited (PPTL) customers in Tanzania: lessons and opportunities 

Agriculture

Tanzania

2021 - 2022

Purpose

PICS bags are hermetic crop storage bags that are designed to reduce post-harvest losses, improve the quality of stored crops, and increase the viable storage period. PICS bags were launched in East Africa in 2013. The design, manufacture and distribution of PICS bags were a part of efforts by development players to reduce post-harvest loss and food insecurity in sub-Saharan Africa. 

In 2018, Pee Pee Tanzania Limited (PPTL) became the lead distributor of PICS bags in Tanzania.  In 2020, AgDevCo invested in PPTL, with the aim of scaling up the manufacturing and distribution of PICS bags across Tanzania. 

To strengthen evidence on the benefits of the bags, AgDevCo contracted EDI Global to implement an impact evaluation to understand the effect of PICS bags on the post-harvest outcomes of smallholder maize and beans farmers in Tanzania.  

Action

EDI Global led the impact evaluation, from inception to evidence dissemination. The impact evaluation explored two key research questions: 

  1. What is the impact of PICS bags, sold by PPTL, on small-scale farmer customers in Tanzania?
  2. How can PPTL increase the volume of their sales of PICS bags to small-scale farmers in Tanzania?

 

EDI Global employed a quasi-experimental research method in the evaluation: specifically, it used the difference-in-differences method to determine the treatment effect. The evaluation method compared farmers who used PICS bags for the first time in 2021 with those who do not use PICS bags. As part of the evaluation, EDI Global also collected data from those who had used PICS bags for a while, and former PICS bag users, for comparison. 

To establish a sample, EDI Global contacted farmers who had responded to a radio advert and expressed an interest in purchasing PICS bags. Out of a total 11,000 farmers who responded to the advert, 5,000 were randomly contacted. Based on the eligibility criteria, respondents were assigned to treatment, control and comparison groups. The final sample was drawn to ensure it was representative of PPTL’s 2020 customer base and covered all 26 mainland regions of Tanzania.    

Data were collected across two phone survey rounds: baseline (June 2021) and endline (May 2022). The survey covered 1,002 smallholder farmers at baseline, with 772 farmers forming the panel sample and completing both baseline and endline surveys. The survey included modules on farmer eligibility, individual characteristics, post-harvest outcomes (storage, post-harvest losses, sales, consumption, revenue, food insecurity) and experiences with PICS bags.  

Impact

EDI Global successfully gathered evidence on several key results, including the following:  

  • treatment farmers stored maize for longer periods than control farmers; 
  • treatment farmers experienced fewer episodes of food insecurity compared to control farmers; and 
  • maize stored in PICS bags did not yield a more favourable price compared to maize stored in alternative storage units. 

 
EDI Global provided AgDevCo and PPTL with baseline and endline analysis reports, as well as conducting dissemination workshops to present the findings to key stakeholders. In addition, EDI Global offered commercial advice to PPTL on improving the product and growing its business. The study findings were used by PPTL to support its business strategy for 2022–2023. 

PrevPreviousUnderstanding character virtue (CV) formation in early childhood and the role of parental CVs and cognitions in promoting children’s CVs in the high-risk, low-income setting of Tanzania
NextWard Development Planning (WDP) Study for Supporting Pastoralism and Agriculture in Recurrent and Protracted Crises (SPARC)  Next

Work With Us

Get In Touch

Interested in impactful research and sustainable development? Drop us a line to get started.
Contact Us

Receive our insights

Sign up to receive our newsletter plus periodic blogs on monitoring, evaluation, research and learning (MERL) and data collection.

Subscribe

Discover

  • Join Our Team
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Projects
  • Our Team
  • Publications

Follow us

  • X (Twitter)
  • Linked In
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

© 2025 EDI Global

Subscribe

* indicates required